Once again, Apple iPad promotional video can be modified to support Flash

ipad | Tuesday February 23 2010 7:30 pm | Comments (0) Tags: , , , ,
Apple’s iPad tablet machine and iPhone, iPod touch, like, does not support Adobe’s Flash Player. Recent Apple CEO Steve Jobs has repeatedly said that Flash a lot of problems, they will not provide Flash support for iPhone OS. But today there is a strange phenomenon, Apple’s official web iPad promotional video, The New York Times Flash content on the page seems to come back.
The end of the conference, Apple has made it clear that iPad not support Flash. But then published online in the official propaganda video, but there may be a normal display Flash content in the New York Times web browsing scenarios, this rapid rise to a lot of speculation. A few days later, Apple changed this video, the new video page is no longer properly display Flash content. The subsequent reports that the New York Times produced video available for Apple’s web page screenshot has led to this misunderstanding.
However, in three weeks later, iPad promotional video in the Flash dynamic content is back. All things considered, this situation there are three possibilities:
Apple’s Web site technical errors result in “correction” by re-provides the old video.
Apple’s change of heart, ready to provide Flash support in the iPad.
Apple has successfully persuaded the New York Times modify the Web site architecture, the iPad, iPhone can show HTML5, H.264 and other standards to provide dynamic content for web pages and video support, as YouTube, Vimeo and other video sites as done before.
The various reports from the recent point of view, the second argument is almost impossible, while the third reason for the credibility of the very high. Perhaps in the near future, we will see a completely abandoned New York Times Web site a new version of Flash.

iphone

Apple’s iPad tablet machine and iPhone, iPod touch, like, does not support Adobe’s Flash Player. Recent Apple CEO Steve Jobs has repeatedly said that Flash a lot of problems, they will not provide Flash support for iPhone OS. But today there is a strange phenomenon, Apple’s official web iPad promotional video, The New York Times Flash content on the page seems to come back.

The end of the conference, Apple has made it clear that iPad not support Flash. But then published online in the official propaganda video, but there may be a normal display Flash content in the New York Times web browsing scenarios, this rapid rise to a lot of speculation. A few days later, Apple changed this video, the new video page is no longer properly display Flash content. The subsequent reports that the New York Times produced video available for Apple’s web page screenshot has led to this misunderstanding.

However, in three weeks later, iPad promotional video in the Flash dynamic content is back. All things considered, this situation there are three possibilities:

Apple’s Web site technical errors result in “correction” by re-provides the old video.

Apple’s change of heart, ready to provide Flash support in the iPad.

Apple has successfully persuaded the New York Times modify the Web site architecture, the iPad, iPhone can show HTML5, H.264 and other standards to provide dynamic content for web pages and video support, as YouTube, Vimeo and other video sites as done before.

The various reports from the recent point of view, the second argument is almost impossible, while the third reason for the credibility of the very high. Perhaps in the near future, we will see a completely abandoned New York Times Web site a new version of Flash.

ZoomMediaPlus introduction of the iPhone can read SD cards peripherals

ZoomMediaPlus introduced a new software is equipped with zommIt use iPhone / iPod touch
peripheral, similar to a card reader. After the user will plug in SD cards is available
through the company’s free software zommIt access the content stored on the SD card. OS 3.0
supports all file formats, including photos, videos, music, and PowerPoint, Excel, Word, PDF
and other documents.
zommIt software also allows users to e-mail, Facebook, flickr and other browse and share
files, or enjoy the media software. Can even transfer files directly to the iPhone or iPod
touch. In addition, the software also allows users to transfer camera pictures to the SD
card, without connecting to a computer.
The peripheral will be available in April priced at 60 U.S. dollars.

iphone

ZoomMediaPlus introduced a new software is equipped with zommIt use iPhone / iPod touch peripheral, similar to a card reader. After the user will plug in SD cards is available through the company’s free software zommIt access the content stored on the SD card. OS 3.0 supports all file formats, including photos, videos, music, and PowerPoint, Excel, Word, PDF and other documents.

zommIt software also allows users to e-mail, Facebook, flickr and other browse and share files, or enjoy the media software. Can even transfer files directly to the iPhone or iPod touch. In addition, the software also allows users to transfer camera pictures to the SD card, without connecting to a computer.

iphone

The peripheral will be available in April priced at 60 U.S. dollars.

HW disclosure of i-phone Trademark Insider Apple to pay 25 million

2010 iphone news, IPHONE, Live | Tuesday February 2 2010 9:12 pm | Comments (0) Tags: , , , ,
Hanwang Technology offering a letter of intent shows that to obtain the i-phone-related
trademarks, Apple paid a total of 365 to Hanwang million (approximately RMB2500 million).
With the release of a letter of intent Hanwang technology offerings, Hanwang a number of
important litigation and legal matters are also disclosed. Offer letter of intent shows that
July 18, 2009, the company has signed with Apple “trademark settlement and transfer
agreement.”
Under the agreement, Hanwang Science and Technology agreed to its application or
registration anywhere in the world for all and any “iPhone”-related trademarks, including
the territory of China “i-phone and graphics” and “I-phone (Art fonts)” and so on sold to
Apple, Apple Hanwang technology together to pay 3.65 million U.S. dollars.
Offer letter of intent shows that Hanwang Science and Technology in 2009 net profit of 85.28
million, the extra mark the transfer of income from its important operating income.
In 2004, HW companies registered in China, “i-phone” trademark and is no longer sold in a
current of smart phone products using the trademark. If Apple allowed without Hanwang sold
in China with i-phone similar to the iPhone, could easily be deemed to constitute trademark
infringement. Apple iPhone into the Chinese market reached a settlement agreement with the
HW, but the two sides have not disclosed the specific content of the settlement agreement.

iphone

Hanwang Technology offering a letter of intent shows that to obtain the i-phone-related trademarks, Apple paid a total of 365 to Hanwang million (approximately RMB2500 million).

With the release of a letter of intent Hanwang technology offerings, Hanwang a number of important litigation and legal matters are also disclosed. Offer letter of intent shows that July 18, 2009, the company has signed with Apple “trademark settlement and transfer agreement.”

Under the agreement, Hanwang Science and Technology agreed to its application or registration anywhere in the world for all and any “iPhone”-related trademarks, including the territory of China “i-phone and graphics” and “I-phone (Art fonts)” and so on sold to Apple, Apple Hanwang technology together to pay 3.65 million U.S. dollars.

Offer letter of intent shows that Hanwang Science and Technology in 2009 net profit of 85.28 million, the extra mark the transfer of income from its important operating income.

In 2004, HW companies registered in China, “i-phone” trademark and is no longer sold in a current of smart phone products using the trademark. If Apple allowed without Hanwang sold in China with i-phone similar to the iPhone, could easily be deemed to constitute trademark infringement. Apple iPhone into the Chinese market reached a settlement agreement with the HW, but the two sides have not disclosed the specific content of the settlement agreement.